As the blogosphere has sucessfully knocked Dan Rather from his roost, it only seems fit that one be selected from among our own to replace him. But who here is so wily, so conniving, so despicable as to have the right stuff to be a television anchorman?
Here are some pros and cons to having Evil Glenn replace Dan Rather:
More web traffic for the rest of us.
Less puppies for the rest of us.
Dan Rather might give up TV and start a blog.
He would probably embarrass the blogosphere with his shoddy journalism and mediocre forgeries.
Consistently choosing evil anchormen will reduce confusion among viewers.
People who watch CBS are probably better off confused anyway.
Finally some sanity in front of the cameras.
No more taking bets on when Rather is going to snap and kill someone.
More balanced coverage.
May jeopardize Castro-CBS partnership.
People who like puppies would probably stop watching CBS and be more productive
Little kids who live near CBS wondering where their puppies went
Dan Rather could gain some weight and grow a beard like other political rejects.
He would be that much closer to being the unabomber.
Competing networks might join us in making up filthy lies about Glenn Reynolds.
Most would probably be lame accusations about ties to Halliburton.
- earth day
- green toilet
- harsh realities
- interior decorating
- white people